RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 4, 2013 at 11:34 am
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2013 at 11:42 am by Doubting Thomas.)
(October 4, 2013 at 10:46 am)Drich Wrote: The Christian presented a statement containing facts (statements that can be proved or disproved.) The Atheist response? was to attack the christian's character, education, and the general viablity of his ablity to make a claim
Only because this particular Christian is completely ignoring any previous points atheists have made toward him/her and continues to spout bullshit without evidence. Any time we refute a point SBG makes, he/she just ignores it and continues on to post other religious blather without a shred of evidence. SBG just keeps shotgunning crap out there and claiming it has to be true. There's no debate or discussion with this person. So why continue to waste time refuting stuff that's already long been refuted when they'll just ignore anything that's inconvenient to them?
And I think you'll see that there is plenty of scientific evidence presented to refute SBG's claims, to which SBG demands detailed data, but when asked for evidence for his/her claims he/she just ignores it. It goes like this:
SBG: Makes claim that science is wrong
Atheist: Please present some evidence.
SBG: Goddidit.
Atheist: Presents scientific study
SBG: Please show all data in incredibly minute detail so that I may pick it apart, and if I find one inconsistency, the entire theory is false.
There is no discussion to be had with SBG, so to ridicule it goes.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.