(October 4, 2013 at 2:08 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(October 4, 2013 at 12:31 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: But the bacteria are still bacteria. So there is no proof there.
The dogs are still dogs.
Cats are still cats.
Sure, the allele distribution in the population may change due to selective breeding or a change in the environment causing certain alleles to be more advantageous, but that is just already existing alleles. You might even have a new allele from a mutation. But the gene itself already existed.
Give all know evidence of one kind changing into another kind.
Without that you have no evidence.
Amphibians aren't still fish. Reptiles aren't still amphibians, Mammals aren't still reptiles. Do your own research, we're not your homework monkeys.
In fact, get just a Bachelor's in biology emphasizing evolution from an accredited college. If you're right, you'll have a lot more information when you're done to refute evolution with, and will at least sound like you know what you're talking about. You might even be able to be a contributor to AnswersInGenesis. If you can't afford it, there are many scholarships you can look into. Clearly, the origin and development of life is something you care deeply about, don't deprive yourself by not considering getting seriously educated on the topic.
But you have no proof that fish became amphibians or that reptiles became Mammals. That is just you assumption.
Please show that occurring now. We have fish. We have reptiles. But fish give birth to fish, and reptiles give birth to reptiles.