(October 5, 2013 at 7:18 am)Chas Wrote:(October 5, 2013 at 6:17 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: We are discussing the topic at hand.
You have failed to refute the post for this topic.
The conclusion stands.
Darwin's book is titled "The Origin of Species" In it Darwin tried to explain where all the species in the world came from. His thesis was not dogs produce dogs. His thesis was all dogs come from some species way back in time that were not dogs through evolution.
Creationists dispute that.
Creationists do not dispute dog breeding.
If you are saying that you are only claiming dog breeding as evolution, then you are a creationist.
The evolutionist world disagrees with you.
Go google it.
Chimps and man do not have a common ancestor. Did anyone actually see that happen? Or is it just a conclusion from assumptions.
Your assumption is not evidence.
The shared DNA is evidence.
All intelligent designers reuse common design structures.
So shared DNA cannot be used to argue for evolution without God versus creation by God.
So you assertion is incorrect.
However an analysis of DNA does proof evolution without God to be false, as I have done with this topics's post
