Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution

[Angrboda]

Oh yah, thanks max. Adopting the ersatz term "negative mutations", negative mutations have a greater tendency to result in reproductive failure through death or other mishap than neutral or beneficial mutations. As a result, you cannot calculate the total as a simple linear projection because the actual rate of reproduction of individuals with negative, neutral, and beneficial mutations are each different (by definition, no less). This is essentially the effect of natural selection. The original argument assumes that detrimental mutations will be conserved at the same rate as neutral or beneficial mutations, contrary to the basic definition of a negative or detrimental mutation (negative in this sense implies differential conservation). So calculating out mutation load by multiplying mutation rate by number of generations is itself wrong and an implicit misrepresentation of the theory of evolution (as it ignores natural selection).

You lose, again.

So, you won't submit your claims to a formal, controlled debate with someone. What's that clucking sound that I hear?