(October 5, 2013 at 4:02 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 5, 2013 at 3:52 pm)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Isn't acknowledging mutations, even as an error, tacit acknowledgement of evolution anyway? It's not the mechanism being contested then, only whether it's an intended consequence.
I'm trying to follow Grace's logic here...but my eyes won't uncross.
Mutations eventually destroy the DNA code of all species given enough time.
So mutations disprove the theory of evolution.
You have data that supports this assertion?
If only you applied the same standards of evidence to your own claims as those of others.