Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution

[Esquilax]

2. I do not assume that DNA is perfect. You assume that random changes can produce complex interrelated new design. That is not what is observed at all. In fact the odds are so against it. so that is another proof against evolution.

Except that the changes aren't random; that's a lie that creationists wish to perpetuate. The changes that continue to exist are based on what natural selection permits, and so there are a number of factors contributing to the complexity we see: environmental factors, social ones, behavioral and predatory ones, even just the interaction with other species, say if another population competes with the same food source. There's very little random about this, beyond the initial mutations themselves; their continued survival is based on factors that sculpt them up into complexity.

One of them, by the way, being the changes that have come before. You know, evolution? You know your argument is bad when it requires that the thing you're arguing against to not even exist before it functions as an argument against said thing.