Not if the victim's White

[kılıç_mehmet]

For years and years we have spilled our blood on the battlefields around Asia, Europe and Africa. We've braved the Chinese in the days of Motun Shanyu, and the Persians in the days of Tong Yabghu. We ruled over Persia and Arabia. And when we got beaten, we just relaxed back and plotted another invasion. So if there is such a hypothetical race with superior fertility that is to rape and beat us into submission, mate, it better destroy us to the last child in the cradle. Only after that, are we beaten. As the words of Bilge Khan state, if the sky does not fall, and the earth beneath does not crumble, who can destroy your country and your laws?

But perhaps you should worry about your own, for conquest and subjugation does not come to you in the form of an army, but in the form of immigrants.

Right...you refuse to see. I guess it's easier to daydream about past glories with your eyes closed, but it also allows the world to pass you by unawares. Time to take a peek, dummy.

Well, past glory is also the foundation of the glory of the future. This is where you people fail. The past is the sole reference for the future, my friend. If I had no knowledge of my past, or say, did not care about my past, why would I care about my future? This is the thinking of a slave. The slave does not yearn for the past, nor does he have a vision for the future. Your blacks are the prime example of it. They are still like slaves, no knowledge of their past beyond slavery, i.e. no past glories to look up to for reference, no vision for the future besides the one that is tied to those whom they formerly called "master".
Am I, or you, on the same level as a slave? Think again.

By the way, I see a lot more than you do in wherever you are, probably somewhere in America, the "new world". I see and understand the chess game of nations and people, and I am determined to play accordingly.

And there were also those African Americans who understood this reasoning. They understood that the African Americans were stripped off of their past identities, and they set out to create one, just for the sole purpose of reference for the future. They saw their future in a place where they lived seperately from their old masters, and they resented their former and current masters. I don't know how you are unable to understand this. The past, my friend, is the only driving force for the archivements of the future. Even knowledge accumulates through time. If scientists refused to look to past archivements for reference, would they be able to make any progress today? Similarly, society, without the reference of the past, good or bad, cannot progress. We take as our reference our past glories, and our past mistakes. One mistake was to actually trust foreigners, and expect loyalty from them. As Nihal Atsız states: "... we are hostile towards every nation, every religion, idea, society, or person that has wronged our race, our state, our land, our sacred values and our pride. Our hate is our religion."