Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)

[Esquilax]

If I debate, I will have total control over the parameters of the debate.

So, here's the debate rules thread. That's how these things are done here, though I'm willing to budge on some of the terms just to get you to account for yourself in an official context. That is, assuming the mods are willing to allow that.

I'm not in control of them, though, and if they decide that I'm not allowed to handicap myself by bowing to your (let's be honest, intensely biased) demands thus far, then I can't really do anything about that. At that point, you can either accept the regular rules, bow out, or take it up with the mods. Once again, I've got no issues debating you under terms you've chosen; just be aware that making them too flagrant isn't going to play well with the audience.

Though I do have to ask: why do you feel the need to tip the scales so far in favor of yourself from the outset, rather than just debating under neutral terms? In your own words, you feel your position is so strong that there's nothing I could do to refute it, so why do you then want to create even more advantages to yourself at my expense? What are you afraid is going to happen?