RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 10, 2013 at 7:26 am
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2013 at 7:29 am by Sword of Christ.)
(October 10, 2013 at 7:17 am)Esquilax Wrote: Then we can test the effects, and demonstrate his existence with science
Yes to a certain extent but it's limited to observation of physically detectable matter/energy.
![[Image: sit02_bscan.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.christianprophecy.org.uk%2Ftselem700px%2Fsit02_bscan.jpg)
![[Image: brain-scan-comparisons.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=hplusmagazine.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Fbrain-scan-comparisons.png)
![[Image: pet1b.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=andrewnewberg.com%2Fgraphics%2Fpet1b.gif)
We can observe that people do enter into a physically observable spiritual state but of course we can't prove God is the source of the cause. Because we can't observe God.
Quote:because things that interact with the physical world are within the bounds of scientific investigation.
I'm not disagreeing with you but the point still stands that you can see, detect or "prove" God.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
