RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 12, 2013 at 3:55 am
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2013 at 4:02 am by Bucky Ball.)
(October 11, 2013 at 6:24 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: So if the energy of the universe is not exactly 0, the Big Bang is false then. Else why bring it up.
But he could not have calculated the energy of the universe, since not all of the universe is even observable.
Besides all observations show the universe does have a mass-energy that is not 0, so the Big Bang is falsified until we get an exact 0.
Wrong again deluded one. Sucks to be you.
Gravity exists, (please go jump off the nearest, tallest building, ASAP, if you need to verify that). Gravity can have a a negative value, (which you would know if you ever took a science class.) Matter and anti-matter exist. They collide and annihilate. That does not imply they did not both exist. The sum of zero of the universe does not break any laws, or invalidate the reality of the positive and negative components.
One can infer the sum of Dark Energy and Dark Matter, by their affects on galaxies. Those are big words for you, so don't strain yourself. You clearly are an ignorant little troll.
(October 10, 2013 at 11:05 am)max-greece Wrote: OK - The universe (simple version):
There was a mummy Universe and a daddy Universe and they got together and after a big bang a baby universe was borne.
And the baby universe grew up to be a big universe just like mummy and daddy.
The question is, "Was Jason Bourne born or borne ?"
(Oh wait ... both).
Never mind.
Carry on.
meow
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist