(January 26, 2010 at 2:39 pm)tackattack Wrote: My extrodinary claim has provide extraordinary evidence to me. Your definition of evidence is required. I have seen a psychologist for depression. I was not diagnosed with any bipoar, schizophrenic or manic disroders. My chemicals were all in balance. You don't "work up to" the holy spirit, it's there when you don't expect it and I've stated several places instintaneous, which, by definition, is the opposite of worked up/in to. Calling the holy spirit psychosemantic would mean that ( assuming from a state of normalcy) conscious or unconscious thought was seeking an affect from a cause. If it is not solicited and separate from any subconscious plans or it references some unknown fact then it's not based in self therefore not psychosematic.
Redefining evidence to mean "Whatever I feel like" is no way to prove anything, except remind us of the point that we can't get inside your head, for good or evil.
First off, it is psychosomatic, not semantic. Psychosomatic occurrences are everywhere - every action you take, every thought you have, does have an effect on your body. The synaptic and chemical messengers of your body provide feedback to your brain, which in turn provides feedback to the body. It is an endless loop. You do not "solicit" a psychosomatic disorder - the levels of consciousness in the body are merely arbitrary separations from a vast amount of chemical interactions, of which minor differences for incredibly short periods of time affect the undercurrent of the entire mind or a small segment of it.
Since this is all your perception, it is quite plausible that the action of "working up" or setting up the environment for "Holy Ghost" time is not obvious to you as it may spring from subtle, unnoticed cues or events that you have grown to ignore.
Please, next time use more spacing, commas and consider a spell checker.
