RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 17, 2013 at 4:49 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2013 at 4:57 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(October 10, 2013 at 10:41 am)John V Wrote: The typical answer to get around the fact that the singularity-big bang model violates the laws of nature is that the laws of nature only came into being a fraction of a second after the big bang.
I'd of thought 'fallacy of composition' (a wall being made of unbreakable bricks wouldn't mean the wall is unbreakable) would sufficiently cover why it doesn't make sense to assume that the laws OF the universe apply TO the universe. However, the fact that the current laws of nature are not the same as they were a fraction of a second before the Big Bang is a good additional point.
truethat;9562002 Wrote:Of course, that makes the singularity-big bang a supernatural explanation for the universe.
If it entertains you to think so, carry on, but it just means that what natural laws are in play depends upon the state of the universe.
(October 17, 2013 at 3:24 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: I use it as a term of endearment for people like yourself. A group of atheists together will be a heathen horde, a small group is a heathen band.
I don't mind being called a heathen, but the mileage of others may vary.