For the most part that describes me. Except the agnostic definition as "impossible to know whether there is a god." I've often been against this definition since if a god exists and showed itself to the world, then it would be possible to know that there is a god. With a god that refuses to show itself and does everything possible to hide its existence, then it would probably be impossible to know. But the difference between that and a nonexistent god is zero.
I think the better definition of agnostic is "one who doesn't claim to know whether or not a god exists."
I think the better definition of agnostic is "one who doesn't claim to know whether or not a god exists."
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
