(January 26, 2010 at 2:09 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Asking for evidence of something that requires that there be no evidence seems like utter stupidity to me. Please explain to me how it isn't.
What's really fucking retarded is the fact you continuously contradict yourself on this matter.
Sometimes it's "No evidence" other times it's "no empirical" or "no corroborative" evidence.
Do you have evidence OF ANY KIND or not?
Because if you don't then you're believing on no rational logical or reasonable reason whatsoever, and that's as delusional a basis of belief of any kind as it completely, totally, utterly and absolutely fucking gets.
EvF
