RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 23, 2013 at 10:58 am
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2013 at 10:58 am by Esquilax.)
(October 23, 2013 at 10:23 am)Sword of Christ Wrote: I don't have an interest in believing your car runs on pixie dust but I'm interested in the ultimate truth of the universe. Either it's God/a purpose giving higher power and we know something about his nature and it's relationship with ourselves or it's...nothing at all.
(I've said all this before, but: ) or, it's a time traveler going back and setting up the universe according to the constants he or she experienced from within the universe, or it was multiple creative intelligences designing different segments of the universe to antagonize one another, or it was one intelligence who was just curious, or time winds backwards outside of the universe and what we're experiencing is just the universe's death in reverse before it rewinds again, or we're a reflection of a mirror universe and all the things within are just reactions opposite to the mirror, or we're a long chain of randomly generated multiverse variants based upon a "prime" universe that was created, or it's a higher power that you don't know anything about, or...
See, I found a paragraph full of alternatives just off the top of my head. Why can't you?
Why do you insist on this false dichotomy even after you've been corrected on it?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
