(October 23, 2013 at 3:07 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: If you want to say it would be evolutionary disadvantageous how about if you stick to eating handicapped children from birth so maintaining the genetic strength within the overall gene pool? From a purely objective evolutionary stance this would be beneficial. However you still know it's wrong.
Do you think that if evolution were responsible for morals, morals would line up with what is good for evolution? Because no one who claims morals are a result of evolution claims that.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell