RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 23, 2013 at 5:10 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2013 at 5:11 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(October 23, 2013 at 11:47 am)Sword of Christ Wrote: They're evidence that someone felt the need to write something about someone for some reason. If as you claim there is no God and there can be no miracles or revelation from God then what are they? You still have something you need to explain you can't just dismiss them away lightly by simply stating that they aren't evidence. You have your opinion do you have anything to back it up with?
Basically you're saying that the bible is true because it is true. Someone wrote The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, so does that mean that everything that happened in that book was true?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
