Why atheism always has a burden of proof

[Bucky Ball]

-In the academic literature nobody moans about burden of proof. This is pretty much an internet thing.

EXACTLY what "literature" are you talking about ? Please summarize it ALL, tally it all, and list ALL the literature you are talking about.

-Proofs only exist in mathematics and alcohol. In the context of theism and atheism, we go by reason and evidence.

Wrong junior. You obviously never heard about "logic".
http://www.millersville.edu/~bikenaga/ma...rence.html
A-theism is the ABSENCE of belief. It makes no further claims or assertions. It's denial of nothing. The claims are *dismissed*, as they carry as much weight as the one that there is a 1957 Chevy orbiting Pluto.
One does not have to take a "position" concerning every preposterous bit of bullshit that gullible humans spit out. One does not have to take a "position" on whether there is a teapot orbiting the sun.
There is more evidence that the Salem Witches actually WERE witches, than there is for the resurrection. I don't have to do anything, when you can't even define what the word "god" means, in coherent terms.
Nice try, junior.
Try harder.