Strong Atheism starts from faith

[tackattack]

---

Everything in faith is covered by the non verifiable clause VOID. The prayer test was a clear abandonment of all logic pertaining to the subject tested. Do you really think, in all honesty, that God would ever be proven? I can't believe that you do, I have too much respect for your intellectual prowess.

Do i think God will be proven? No, he doesn't exist. Do i think there would be evidence for him if he did exist? Yes.

I asked you once before why god requires that there is absolutely no evidence for his existence and how you know this to be true. but you completely ignored them so i will post them again:

1) Why does God require and thus ensure that there is no evidence for his existence?

2) How do you know your answer to 1) to be true?

---

I answered you EXACTLY above. That you're too much of a fucktard to understand possibly defines you.

You didn't give me an answer, just dodge and spin.

Do you or do you not have any empirical or logical evidence for the existence of god?

If yes, present it.

---

1) The idea of God as percieved by human intellect requires justification, yes. God does provide evidence through influence that he exists that is in relation to his nature, insubstantial, no unsubstantiatable.

2) Humans could exist without seeking or identifying true and false but that's not our nature. I have no way of giving substantial (all 5 webster contexts) evidence to substantiate an idea of God that isn't subjective so I don't know objectively that it's true. However subjective truth doesn't equal false.

3)logical conclusions based off of relative subjective evidence in the Existance of God... hmmmm . Well first we'll have to define God and existance and you'll have to conceed to 2) above or it's a pointless excercise of debate which I want nothing to do with personally.