Challenge to atheists: I find your lack of faith disturbing!

[Aractus]

You can fuck off if you expect me to literally provide the paper or linen or whatever the document was originally created on.

So you're admitting, then, that what they wrote down is lost - but you're still sure it existed?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_t...in_sources

• Diodorus
  
  Bibliotheca historica (Library of world history), written in Greek by the Sicilian historian Diodorus Siculus, from which Book 17 relates the conquests of Alexander, based almost entirely on Cleitarchus and Hieronymus of Cardia. It is the oldest surviving Greek source (1st century BC). Diodorus regarded Alexander like Caesar as a key historical figure and chronological marker.

That's 300 years after the death of Alexander the Great! What? No contemporary accounts at all?

Do you have the original? Of course not, I did a quick google search for this one:

http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/manusc...icilus.htm

The earliest manuscripts you have for Bibliotheca historica is 10th century, and none of the manuscripts are complete - even with all put together you're missing over half of it!

My point is that you idiots are always demanding standards that can't be met by ANY characters from the ancient world prior to the printing press, not Alexander the Great, and not anyone else. Alexander the Great - no surviving contemporary writings. Jesus - 27 New Testament books - contemporary writings written in the decades following his death; not centuries later.