RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
October 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm
I stand by my statement because I still see the "speed of light changing drastically" idea thrown around by creationists. It was your assertion that nobody uses that argument, period, not that nobody uses it any more. Can you be 100% certain that no creationist anywhere uses that argument at all? You're just trying to weasel out of being wrong (yet again).
The fact is that it's just yet another of many unproven hypotheses which creationists have invented and then spread around as fact and only discarded after they realized how foolish they looked espousing it as fact. Look at all the nonsense ideas that Kent Hovind dreamed up and which are now no longer considered good arguments by YEC's.
The fact is that it's just yet another of many unproven hypotheses which creationists have invented and then spread around as fact and only discarded after they realized how foolish they looked espousing it as fact. Look at all the nonsense ideas that Kent Hovind dreamed up and which are now no longer considered good arguments by YEC's.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
