The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old

[Zazzy]

"Are there any evolutionists who have published worked in creation peer-reviewed journals? "

You think it is a genuine question , right?

I think he means to give me tit for tat, because he sees those things as equal. And I'll give him a chance to prove that they are instead of dismissing him out of hand. I've never seen a creationist science journal, and I'm actually curious. Just as newbies to any field need help finding the best material out there, he can help me by showing me his best material. I'm not curious enough to go wade through it, but I am curious enough to read something he provides me.

Zazzy, there are no peer-reviewed creation journals. It's a red herring. Creationism is not a science. It is a religious belief. Don't believe me? Ask the Supreme Court.

I've been a bench scientist long enough to know that if there are creationist journals, they aren't useful to bench research. And I've been battling creationism in the public school system long enough to know it's a religious belief. What I don't know is what Statler Waldorf thinks is a good primary creationist research paper in my field. I hope you'll join me in looking at what he provides.