RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
October 30, 2013 at 12:55 pm
(October 30, 2013 at 12:17 pm)orogenicman Wrote: I would think that what he has already provided is a good example of how disingenuous he is - citing mostly outdated research papers from mostly dead or retired researchers that have nothing to do with creationism as his example of creationism research. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out his game plan.
And he has the knack for trying to change the meaning of what he posted before when he's proved wrong. Like in this thread where I mentioned the creationist idea of the speed of light changing drastically, and he claimed that wasn't something creationists claimed. When I proved him wrong with numerous links, he claimed it's not what creationists claim now. Which if that's what he really meant, he could have mentioned that in his initial response.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
