RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
November 1, 2013 at 4:49 pm
(October 31, 2013 at 12:13 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote:(October 30, 2013 at 1:09 pm)orogenicman Wrote: He is going to have to explain what he means by "now" because I've had that very argument with them in the past two years. Now, unless there was some sort of creationist symposium this year in which all the players agree that their claim was bogus, then I think it is safe to assume that he is lying.
Well, his claim to me was that the changing speed of light is an argument which was proposed by creationists but no longer used. I guess the memo didn't get out to all creationists. True, Answers in Genesis does have the speed of light change in their list of arguments that creationists shouldn't use, but they still use it along with all the other ridiculous arguments on that list.
I seem to remember he used it himself ages ago.....but then my mind is old my brain is grey and withered.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
