Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2025, 9:44 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity?
#9
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity?
(November 5, 2013 at 11:53 am)Chuck Wrote: Locally very bad. There are still places out in the open at Fukushima site where the ambient radiation will kill you in less than 4 hours.

This is the article that I found with the 4 hour lethal data.
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...lear-plant

TEPCO is reporting 1800mSv (millisieverts) at the joints of some of the tanks holding contaminated water. This certainly isn't good, but I want to give some perspective to the article's title:
Quote: Radiation spikes to lethal levels at Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant

As alarming as an 1800mSv source is, one must consider distance from the source. An easy way to estimate dose rates at particular distances is to use the inverse square law. In this case, the dose rate at 100m would be 0.18mSv. A CT scan delivers about 9mSv.

Also, the article reported that it was beta radiation that was detected (electrons and positrons). A majority of beta radiation can be attenuated with about 6mm of aluminum.

Compared to many of the reports I've read regarding Fukushima, this article would only rate about a 2 (out of 10) on the hysteria meter. Fukushima is still a huge fucking mess and no doubt presents continued environmental risk until fully contained and cleaned; however, wild conjecture about global impact without the full UNSCEAR report is irresponsible.

I also think that UNSCEAR could do a lot better job of updating the general public about the progress of its investigation.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Gooders1002 - November 5, 2013 at 11:06 am
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Tonus - November 5, 2013 at 11:34 am
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Gooders1002 - November 5, 2013 at 11:42 am
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Anomalocaris - November 5, 2013 at 11:53 am
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Cato - November 5, 2013 at 2:44 pm
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Cato - November 5, 2013 at 2:08 pm
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Anomalocaris - November 5, 2013 at 2:14 pm
RE: Fukushima still a Threat to Humanity? - by Anomalocaris - November 5, 2013 at 3:46 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How humans are still evolving I_am_not_mafia 26 4851 June 9, 2018 at 10:34 am
Last Post: Fireball
  I still think getting a flu shot is directly linked to getting the flu Silver 64 11050 April 4, 2018 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Magilla
  Dire Warning to Humanity chimp3 9 2356 November 15, 2017 at 11:25 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Why smart machines are a threat to the way humanity currently exists ThoughtCurvature 3 1221 September 5, 2017 at 5:08 am
Last Post: ThoughtCurvature
  Not a good time for humanity, the ai singularity is here MellisaClarke 61 19584 May 23, 2017 at 5:45 am
Last Post: chimp3
  Advance to help Humanity brewer 72 15300 August 17, 2015 at 3:49 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  The top three biggest threats to humanity.... lifesagift 58 13595 November 8, 2014 at 8:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Still Learning AT7iLA 28 9075 March 14, 2014 at 2:27 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Is indeterminism in science still alive or dead? josef rosenkranz 7 5999 September 19, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)