(November 8, 2013 at 5:38 pm)Mstricky Wrote: I absolutely cannot believe your excuse. Crucifixion is crucifixion as the disciples were well accustomed to so why would they say they hung him from a tree. You are clutching at straws. Hanging from a tree is definitely not being crucified and Peter/Paul would definitely have known the differenceRemember, you're talking to the guy who reads in Luke that Jesus tarried to have dinner and thinks this tarrying could have lasted 40 days.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist