RE: anyone else here not pro life for the sake of being pro life?
November 13, 2013 at 12:11 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2013 at 12:14 pm by Mystical.)
(November 13, 2013 at 12:07 pm)Walking Void Wrote:missluckie26 Wrote:I'd consider someone who didn't fight for my life when I had not the will to fight for my own: amoral.
When You say 'no' "will to fight", are You referring to people who do not choose life, or are You talking about people who are too confused to make that decision?
both
Fidel, in my experiences in Nursing homes its the ones with dimentia who were the happiest. Unless you're making a case for not having to grow old: then I consider being alive in and of itself worth it, dimentia or not.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
