Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 2, 2025, 8:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proper response
#15
RE: Proper response
(November 17, 2013 at 11:17 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 17, 2013 at 11:07 pm)Stue Denim Wrote: Unless/until they are real small, then they do IIRC.

I think you may be confusing them with neutron stars or something similar, which are indeed insanely massive for their tiny size but are a different animal from black holes.

Brief history o time:

Quote: Primordial black holes with initial masses less than this figure would already have completely evaporated, but those with slightly greater masses would still be emitting radiation in the form of X rays and gamma rays. These X rays and gamma rays are like waves of light, but with a much shorter wavelength. Such holes hardly deserve the epithet black: they really are white hot and are emitting energy at a rate of about ten thousand megawatts.

The smaller they get, the more they emit, and the more energetic their emissions.
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Proper response - by matasteme - November 17, 2013 at 1:44 am
RE: Proper response - by pineapplebunnybounce - November 17, 2013 at 1:52 am
RE: Proper response - by freedomfromforum - November 17, 2013 at 1:57 am
RE: Proper response - by Tea Earl Grey Hot - November 17, 2013 at 2:20 am
RE: Proper response - by Cyberman - November 17, 2013 at 2:24 am
RE: Proper response - by freedomfromforum - November 17, 2013 at 2:42 am
RE: Proper response - by Darth - November 17, 2013 at 11:07 pm
RE: Proper response - by pineapplebunnybounce - November 17, 2013 at 3:12 am
RE: Proper response - by Cyberman - November 17, 2013 at 4:40 am
RE: Proper response - by MindForgedManacle - November 17, 2013 at 10:47 pm
RE: Proper response - by KichigaiNeko - November 17, 2013 at 3:12 am
RE: Proper response - by matasteme - November 17, 2013 at 3:18 am
RE: Proper response - by Minimalist - November 17, 2013 at 11:15 pm
RE: Proper response - by Cyberman - November 17, 2013 at 11:17 pm
RE: Proper response - by Darth - November 18, 2013 at 4:46 am
RE: Proper response - by Cyberman - November 18, 2013 at 9:44 pm
RE: Proper response - by Whateverist - November 18, 2013 at 9:51 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Finally an atheist proper, with views and questions Lucian 62 4414 June 12, 2024 at 10:32 pm
Last Post: Prycejosh1987
  The Possibly Proper Death Litany, aka ... Gawdzilla Sama 11 1539 December 18, 2023 at 1:15 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Response to Darkmatter2525 ""Why Does Anything Matter?" Eik0932 23 3591 September 26, 2018 at 12:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Objective morality as a proper basic belief Little Henry 609 185573 July 29, 2017 at 1:02 am
Last Post: Astonished
  ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it" The Joker 195 30167 November 24, 2016 at 7:30 pm
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  Have you ever actually heard an response that made you stop and think? jmoney_419 32 6560 September 23, 2016 at 2:36 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  A Scientific Response to Creationist on: Kinds Duke Guilmon 28 9247 April 27, 2014 at 8:45 am
Last Post: Duke Guilmon
Question Response to a sneeze? LeoVonFrost 40 9465 August 10, 2013 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Response to Local Readers' Forum Comments EscapingDelusion 15 6318 August 31, 2012 at 12:33 pm
Last Post: EscapingDelusion
  Email response I sent to someone.... Voltair 0 1346 February 21, 2012 at 4:06 pm
Last Post: Voltair



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)