What's with all the nit-picking? I'll pick some fucking nits. Firstly, that Stanford definition is fucked up. If theism is a belief in god, then it follows that atheism is without a belief in god. Denying someone's belief in god is a far cry from denying the existence of god. Furthermore, the author uses God, which clearly shows a bias towards a particular, and particularly ill-defined, god.
So if you want to use this broke-assed definition, first you must tell me what Uri means by "God," and then I'll tell you I lack a belief in it.
So if you want to use this broke-assed definition, first you must tell me what Uri means by "God," and then I'll tell you I lack a belief in it.
