Well there can be evidence of God as in, what is indication to the believer that God exists. Whether it's actually valid, proper, evidence is another matter. I thought that evidence itself, even if it's invalid - is what starbucks was speaking of and not just valid evidence.
The evidence of the two people loving each other could be false. And it could have NOT been evidence to all the outsiders, they could all think the relationship was bullshit, and then the two people broke up - so the outsiders were right. But they still believed in what they thought was evidence of the others love. They didn't just depend on blind trust - faith - they each genuinely thought that their partner was giving signs, clues, evidence - with body language and with words or whatever - that they really loved the other one. And yet, the whole thing turned out to be a farce, for instance.
EvF
The evidence of the two people loving each other could be false. And it could have NOT been evidence to all the outsiders, they could all think the relationship was bullshit, and then the two people broke up - so the outsiders were right. But they still believed in what they thought was evidence of the others love. They didn't just depend on blind trust - faith - they each genuinely thought that their partner was giving signs, clues, evidence - with body language and with words or whatever - that they really loved the other one. And yet, the whole thing turned out to be a farce, for instance.
EvF