So in essence you want to verify the idea of god by the book that states the idea. It seems like a process of self-referential verification to me, aka circular reasoning.
The peculiar thing is that we started this dialogue from two bible quotes claiming various attributes of god. You claimed that god is non-verifiable and that that statement is in the bible. But if that statement is in the bible, and you want to use the bible as verification, than the statement contradicts itself. Than you as a believer either have the choice to claim that your god is unverifiable which results in sheer fabulation of your god and having no basis to even connect the bible and your god or to accept that the bible contradicts itself leading to refutation of the god concept by your own standard (“god pertains to logic”).
Either way you’re belief system is in dire straits. Go figure.
The peculiar thing is that we started this dialogue from two bible quotes claiming various attributes of god. You claimed that god is non-verifiable and that that statement is in the bible. But if that statement is in the bible, and you want to use the bible as verification, than the statement contradicts itself. Than you as a believer either have the choice to claim that your god is unverifiable which results in sheer fabulation of your god and having no basis to even connect the bible and your god or to accept that the bible contradicts itself leading to refutation of the god concept by your own standard (“god pertains to logic”).
Either way you’re belief system is in dire straits. Go figure.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0