And Hells come back to haunt me

[Fidel_Castronaut]

The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the proof.

Nope. Not evidence Snowyboy, not evidence at all.

Here's the deal: if God created the U., nothing needs to be explained since it was 'created' (blueprint to construction). one may desire to learn the methodization but no explanation needed; whereas, if one doesn't like the idea of God, then they need to get real busy with the 'prove it' non-creation evidence that by now has been cleverly and clearly fashion together. you that worship at the altar of science, lets see what you got.

Cop out with circular reasoning and shifting the burden of proof.

Shit, Snowy, that's all you've got?

Why do you get all pissy when we reject your ludicrous unsubstantiated claims?

---

In what version of reality is it simpler to assume an all-powerful intelligent being, of at least infinite complexity by definition, over the least complex state possible? Did I turn over two pages or something?

And just to reiterate: I can bend spoons with the power of my thoughts, and the proof is I've just told you I can do it.

a principle of science is take the simplest explanation.

FALSE!

FFS! Parsimony is NOT a 'principle of science'. Some shit ain't easy to explain. Ever taken a look at Quantum Mechanics recently? 'Simple' is a subjective term. You can't say that parsimony is the ultimate aim and THEN just assume that your parsimonious answer is the right one.

Shit, man. This is like, logic for 5 year olds here. What the hell is wrong with you?