RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 5, 2013 at 12:13 pm
(This post was last modified: December 5, 2013 at 12:16 pm by orogenicman.)
Optimistic Mysanthrope Wrote:Separating the detectors will re-introduce the simultaneity problem. The fact that simultaneity has been previously determined via the oscilloscope becomes irrelevant
You seem to be of the belief that it cannot be accounted for and thus taken into consideration when conducting such an experiment. I take the position that we have been conducting scientific experiments for hundreds of years and are pretty good at taking into consideration such things as instrument error, simultaneity, and the like. Why is it, in your opinion, impossible to measure any differences in the set up at 1,000 feet as opposed to any other distance, or no distance? Why, in your opinion, is a calibration method irrelevant? We know the speed at which electrons move through wires. We have two wires of known length, and detectors with known properties separated by 1,000 feet. If firing a laser beam across those detectors produces the same result regardless of direction, how is that not a significant result? You haven't re-introduced a synchronous issue to the experiment because you are taking all measurements are the same location. You only have one clock. You have accounted for the distances by measuring any error that introduces.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero