The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: August 4, 2026, 1:53 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old

Optimistic Mysanthrope Offline

Member

Religious Views: pantheist loneshark

Posts: 579
Threads: 3
Joined: October 18, 2013
Reputation: 14

#242

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old

December 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm

(December 5, 2013 at 6:20 pm)orogenicman Wrote: According to special relativity, if two objects are moving (or if one object is moving relative to the other), they are in different frames. If they are not moving, they are in the same frame whether they are 1mm apart or 1 light year apart. The detectors are not moving; the clock is not moving. They are all in the same frame, so there can be no time dilation between them. The only things moving are the laser pulse and the electrons inside the wiring circuit, both of which have known and testable properties.

You don't deserve a computer

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Justtristo - June 27, 2012 at 4:43 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Darwinian - June 27, 2012 at 6:10 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Justtristo - June 27, 2012 at 7:13 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by NoMoreFaith - June 27, 2012 at 7:24 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 21, 2013 at 6:01 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - October 21, 2013 at 6:08 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 21, 2013 at 6:19 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - October 21, 2013 at 7:58 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 21, 2013 at 7:00 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 21, 2013 at 7:24 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 21, 2013 at 7:39 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 21, 2013 at 7:56 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 21, 2013 at 8:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Gambit - June 27, 2012 at 7:48 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Cato - June 27, 2012 at 7:51 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - June 27, 2012 at 10:43 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by popeyespappy - June 27, 2012 at 2:03 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Jackalope - June 27, 2012 at 2:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zaphod Beeblebrox - June 27, 2012 at 8:41 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Justtristo - June 27, 2012 at 9:18 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zaphod Beeblebrox - June 27, 2012 at 11:02 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Thor - June 27, 2012 at 10:27 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - October 25, 2013 at 3:43 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - October 25, 2013 at 4:04 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 25, 2013 at 4:38 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - October 25, 2013 at 5:07 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 25, 2013 at 6:04 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 25, 2013 at 6:39 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - October 25, 2013 at 8:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 25, 2013 at 10:54 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - June 27, 2012 at 11:47 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - June 27, 2012 at 1:08 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - June 27, 2012 at 1:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Gambit - June 27, 2012 at 1:46 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - June 28, 2012 at 1:16 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - June 27, 2012 at 2:31 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by libalchris - June 28, 2012 at 1:07 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Welsh cake - June 28, 2012 at 1:59 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - June 29, 2012 at 5:57 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by KichigaiNeko - June 29, 2012 at 8:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Norfolk And Chance - June 29, 2012 at 10:17 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Dolphins are the best - October 19, 2013 at 9:11 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Kayenneh - October 19, 2013 at 10:10 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - October 21, 2013 at 3:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by TheBeardedDude - October 21, 2013 at 3:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tonus - October 21, 2013 at 4:10 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by TheBeardedDude - October 21, 2013 at 4:18 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by ThomM - October 21, 2013 at 6:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - October 21, 2013 at 3:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Bob Kelso - October 21, 2013 at 3:46 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 21, 2013 at 5:42 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by LastPoet - October 21, 2013 at 5:55 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tonus - October 21, 2013 at 6:52 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by ThomM - October 21, 2013 at 7:27 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 21, 2013 at 10:48 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 22, 2013 at 5:13 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 22, 2013 at 5:41 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 22, 2013 at 7:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 22, 2013 at 9:56 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - October 23, 2013 at 11:33 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 22, 2013 at 10:13 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - October 22, 2013 at 11:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Owlix - October 24, 2013 at 1:40 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - October 24, 2013 at 2:20 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 24, 2013 at 8:33 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Cato - October 24, 2013 at 1:47 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - October 24, 2013 at 1:50 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Cato - October 24, 2013 at 2:24 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - October 24, 2013 at 3:54 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 24, 2013 at 6:26 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by TheBeardedDude - October 24, 2013 at 8:09 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - October 24, 2013 at 12:42 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by TheBeardedDude - October 24, 2013 at 1:48 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 24, 2013 at 1:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 24, 2013 at 1:40 pm

Re: RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by TheBeardedDude - October 25, 2013 at 4:00 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Owlix - October 25, 2013 at 5:34 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 25, 2013 at 5:46 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Paraselene - October 25, 2013 at 6:48 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Thor - October 26, 2013 at 12:57 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - October 26, 2013 at 7:50 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - October 27, 2013 at 2:06 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Owlix - October 25, 2013 at 6:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 25, 2013 at 7:02 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - October 25, 2013 at 6:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 25, 2013 at 9:18 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Owlix - October 25, 2013 at 9:32 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by KichigaiNeko - October 25, 2013 at 9:34 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Owlix - October 25, 2013 at 9:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by freedomfromforum - October 27, 2013 at 2:31 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 28, 2013 at 8:10 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - October 29, 2013 at 6:13 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 28, 2013 at 8:48 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - October 28, 2013 at 9:26 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 29, 2013 at 8:04 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - October 29, 2013 at 7:14 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 29, 2013 at 8:30 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 29, 2013 at 10:30 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 29, 2013 at 10:06 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 29, 2013 at 11:05 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 30, 2013 at 8:28 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 30, 2013 at 9:41 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - October 30, 2013 at 11:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 30, 2013 at 12:17 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 30, 2013 at 12:55 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 30, 2013 at 1:09 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - October 31, 2013 at 12:13 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 31, 2013 at 7:19 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 1, 2013 at 5:03 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 1, 2013 at 9:32 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - November 1, 2013 at 10:40 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 4, 2013 at 2:41 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - November 4, 2013 at 4:25 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tonus - November 4, 2013 at 5:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 4, 2013 at 5:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - November 4, 2013 at 3:05 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 7, 2013 at 6:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - November 1, 2013 at 4:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - October 30, 2013 at 9:55 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - October 29, 2013 at 11:17 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - October 30, 2013 at 10:06 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 1, 2013 at 9:41 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 1, 2013 at 9:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 1, 2013 at 9:59 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 2, 2013 at 12:50 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Paraselene - November 1, 2013 at 10:01 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 1, 2013 at 11:38 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 2, 2013 at 12:22 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Thor - November 2, 2013 at 9:22 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 2, 2013 at 10:18 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Thor - November 3, 2013 at 12:12 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 2, 2013 at 11:16 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - November 2, 2013 at 11:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Doubting Thomas - November 3, 2013 at 12:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 4, 2013 at 2:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 4, 2013 at 4:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 6, 2013 at 10:54 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 7, 2013 at 3:21 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 7, 2013 at 9:19 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 7, 2013 at 11:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 7, 2013 at 11:54 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 7, 2013 at 3:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 7, 2013 at 3:58 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 18, 2013 at 6:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - November 19, 2013 at 6:01 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - November 19, 2013 at 4:01 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 20, 2013 at 8:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - November 20, 2013 at 10:39 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2013 at 6:14 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 19, 2013 at 5:51 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by The Valkyrie - November 19, 2013 at 6:25 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 19, 2013 at 12:57 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 21, 2013 at 7:58 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 22, 2013 at 8:05 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 22, 2013 at 6:31 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - November 23, 2013 at 1:07 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Jackie - November 22, 2013 at 6:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 22, 2013 at 7:10 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Jackie - November 23, 2013 at 2:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 22, 2013 at 7:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 22, 2013 at 7:34 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 23, 2013 at 10:30 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - November 22, 2013 at 7:39 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 22, 2013 at 7:54 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Paraselene - November 22, 2013 at 7:57 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - November 22, 2013 at 8:09 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - November 22, 2013 at 8:14 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 24, 2013 at 8:40 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 24, 2013 at 10:19 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - November 24, 2013 at 1:29 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 26, 2013 at 2:34 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zazzy - November 25, 2013 at 11:57 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 26, 2013 at 6:50 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 26, 2013 at 6:58 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 26, 2013 at 9:56 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 26, 2013 at 9:19 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 26, 2013 at 10:54 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 26, 2013 at 2:44 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 26, 2013 at 6:46 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 26, 2013 at 7:54 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 26, 2013 at 8:16 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 27, 2013 at 12:53 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 27, 2013 at 8:56 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 27, 2013 at 11:06 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 27, 2013 at 11:26 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 27, 2013 at 11:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 27, 2013 at 12:06 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 27, 2013 at 12:32 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 27, 2013 at 8:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 28, 2013 at 2:59 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 28, 2013 at 5:18 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 28, 2013 at 5:50 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 28, 2013 at 7:37 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 28, 2013 at 7:45 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 28, 2013 at 8:17 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - November 28, 2013 at 8:45 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 28, 2013 at 11:20 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - November 28, 2013 at 1:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - November 29, 2013 at 9:23 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - November 28, 2013 at 2:33 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - November 28, 2013 at 2:38 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Godlesspanther - November 28, 2013 at 2:43 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - November 28, 2013 at 3:09 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - November 28, 2013 at 6:43 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 1, 2013 at 5:02 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 1, 2013 at 7:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 2, 2013 at 6:09 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2013 at 6:37 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 2, 2013 at 7:07 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - December 2, 2013 at 7:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 2, 2013 at 8:17 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - December 2, 2013 at 11:56 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 3, 2013 at 4:48 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - December 5, 2013 at 5:26 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 5, 2013 at 6:03 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tonus - December 4, 2013 at 11:54 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Lion IRC - December 2, 2013 at 10:02 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by ablenova - December 2, 2013 at 7:18 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - December 2, 2013 at 10:34 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Lion IRC - December 3, 2013 at 5:12 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2013 at 11:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 3, 2013 at 5:12 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 3, 2013 at 5:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 4, 2013 at 7:32 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 4, 2013 at 5:31 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 4, 2013 at 5:48 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 4, 2013 at 7:24 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 4, 2013 at 7:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Ryantology - December 4, 2013 at 7:44 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 4, 2013 at 7:46 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 5, 2013 at 11:22 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 12:13 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 5, 2013 at 12:40 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 4:06 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 5, 2013 at 4:21 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 5, 2013 at 12:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 5, 2013 at 4:44 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 6:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 5, 2013 at 7:22 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 7:10 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 9:02 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 5, 2013 at 9:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 9:57 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 5, 2013 at 10:09 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 5, 2013 at 10:30 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 6, 2013 at 12:03 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 6, 2013 at 1:59 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 6, 2013 at 10:19 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Michael Schubert - December 5, 2013 at 11:00 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Ryantology - December 7, 2013 at 12:28 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 7, 2013 at 1:18 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by ThomM - December 7, 2013 at 10:27 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 7, 2013 at 5:01 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 7, 2013 at 10:09 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 9, 2013 at 6:40 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 9, 2013 at 10:03 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 12, 2013 at 7:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 12, 2013 at 10:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 13, 2013 at 2:06 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 13, 2013 at 7:01 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 14, 2013 at 5:12 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Optimistic Mysanthrope - December 15, 2013 at 4:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 17, 2013 at 8:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 18, 2013 at 1:06 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 18, 2013 at 7:40 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - December 18, 2013 at 8:33 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 19, 2013 at 4:44 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 20, 2013 at 8:25 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by theyear12013 - December 21, 2013 at 12:49 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tonus - December 21, 2013 at 3:42 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - December 21, 2013 at 9:27 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 21, 2013 at 10:56 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 24, 2013 at 4:16 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Godlesspanther - December 24, 2013 at 6:55 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 25, 2013 at 11:46 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - December 26, 2013 at 12:07 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 26, 2013 at 12:09 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - December 26, 2013 at 12:30 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 27, 2013 at 12:53 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - December 27, 2013 at 12:58 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - December 26, 2013 at 12:58 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 26, 2013 at 1:06 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 26, 2013 at 9:15 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - December 26, 2013 at 9:23 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 26, 2013 at 4:04 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 26, 2013 at 4:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - December 26, 2013 at 10:55 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 27, 2013 at 2:55 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by KichigaiNeko - December 27, 2013 at 8:12 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 27, 2013 at 8:19 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by KichigaiNeko - December 27, 2013 at 8:21 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 27, 2013 at 8:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 28, 2013 at 12:23 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 30, 2013 at 8:35 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - December 30, 2013 at 10:44 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tea Earl Grey Hot - December 27, 2013 at 8:38 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - December 27, 2013 at 9:16 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - December 27, 2013 at 9:51 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - January 3, 2014 at 8:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - January 6, 2014 at 12:25 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - January 6, 2014 at 9:14 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - January 6, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - January 6, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - January 7, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - January 6, 2014 at 3:17 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - January 8, 2014 at 9:26 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Mudhammam - January 8, 2014 at 10:17 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - January 15, 2014 at 7:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - January 16, 2014 at 12:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - January 16, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - January 21, 2014 at 2:55 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Cyberman - January 21, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by WesOlsen - January 21, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - January 24, 2014 at 10:40 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 6, 2014 at 8:57 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - February 7, 2014 at 11:48 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Whateverist - February 6, 2014 at 9:02 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 6, 2014 at 9:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Esquilax - February 7, 2014 at 1:52 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Whateverist - February 7, 2014 at 11:44 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Chas - February 8, 2014 at 5:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Anomalocaris - February 6, 2014 at 11:53 pm

Re: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by StuW - February 7, 2014 at 12:11 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - February 7, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Mudhammam - February 7, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by WesOlsen - February 7, 2014 at 4:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - February 8, 2014 at 5:51 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - February 11, 2014 at 9:20 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 14, 2014 at 10:18 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by JuliaL - February 15, 2014 at 12:19 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Tonus - February 14, 2014 at 10:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Ryantology - February 14, 2014 at 10:33 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - February 15, 2014 at 11:23 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - February 15, 2014 at 11:32 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 15, 2014 at 6:36 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by orogenicman - February 15, 2014 at 11:31 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 16, 2014 at 3:35 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 16, 2014 at 5:32 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 16, 2014 at 5:46 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 16, 2014 at 6:18 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 16, 2014 at 10:57 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 18, 2014 at 6:04 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by StuW - February 18, 2014 at 8:24 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 18, 2014 at 9:54 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 19, 2014 at 6:20 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 19, 2014 at 7:36 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 19, 2014 at 7:45 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 19, 2014 at 8:02 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 19, 2014 at 8:18 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 19, 2014 at 8:30 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 19, 2014 at 8:39 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 19, 2014 at 8:40 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 19, 2014 at 8:54 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 19, 2014 at 9:07 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 19, 2014 at 9:13 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 19, 2014 at 9:17 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 19, 2014 at 8:38 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 20, 2014 at 5:47 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by JuliaL - February 25, 2014 at 11:54 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 26, 2014 at 3:27 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by JuliaL - February 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 20, 2014 at 5:26 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 20, 2014 at 7:20 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 20, 2014 at 7:33 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 20, 2014 at 7:44 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Crossless1 - February 19, 2014 at 8:53 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 19, 2014 at 11:50 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 20, 2014 at 4:49 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - February 20, 2014 at 1:04 am

The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Rampant.A.I. - February 20, 2014 at 1:13 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Zen Badger - February 20, 2014 at 8:14 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 20, 2014 at 8:34 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 21, 2014 at 6:18 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 21, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 21, 2014 at 9:23 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 22, 2014 at 3:19 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 24, 2014 at 5:15 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - February 22, 2014 at 6:17 am

The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Rampant.A.I. - February 22, 2014 at 4:51 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Statler Waldorf - February 25, 2014 at 7:22 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Wyrd of Gawd - February 25, 2014 at 7:28 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 25, 2014 at 9:51 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by downbeatplumb - February 24, 2014 at 3:44 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Alex K - February 24, 2014 at 5:27 pm

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - March 3, 2014 at 12:30 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Wyrd of Gawd - March 3, 2014 at 2:03 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - March 3, 2014 at 3:47 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Wyrd of Gawd - March 3, 2014 at 4:37 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by LostLocke - March 3, 2014 at 9:52 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by popeyespappy - March 3, 2014 at 10:34 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Wyrd of Gawd - March 4, 2014 at 4:23 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Bad Writer - March 3, 2014 at 12:40 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by snowtracks - March 3, 2014 at 1:35 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by JuliaL - March 3, 2014 at 3:42 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Cyberman - March 3, 2014 at 12:56 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Bad Writer - March 3, 2014 at 1:03 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Cyberman - March 3, 2014 at 1:06 am

RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old - by Minimalist - March 3, 2014 at 3:25 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Still Angry about Abraham and Isaac	zwanzig	29	8016	October 1, 2023 at 7:58 pm Last Post: LinuxGal
	Why are you (still) a Christian?	FrustratedFool	304	71742	September 29, 2023 at 5:16 pm Last Post: Bucky Ball
	GOD's Mercy While It Is Still Today - Believe!	Mercyvessel	102	25480	January 9, 2022 at 1:31 am Last Post: Fake Messiah
	The story of Noah' s Ark - or - God is dumber than you.	onlinebiker	75	19576	September 24, 2021 at 5:53 pm Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
	[Not] Breaking news; Catholic church still hateful	Nay_Sayer	18	5123	March 17, 2021 at 11:43 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian?	KUSA	371	161838	May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am Last Post: Paleophyte
	Age of the Universe/Earth	Ferrocyanide	31	8877	January 8, 2020 at 10:06 pm Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
	In UK atheists considred more moral than theists.	downbeatplumb	254	77405	September 20, 2018 at 5:08 pm Last Post: Minimalist
	German Catholic Priests Abused More Than 3,600 Kids	Fake Messiah	17	5253	September 14, 2018 at 5:43 pm Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
	No-one under 25 in iceland believes god created the universe	downbeatplumb	8	3657	August 19, 2018 at 7:55 pm Last Post: Succubus

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me