(December 13, 2013 at 4:07 pm)rasetsu Wrote:The argument concerns the interpretation of the evidence at hand. My critiques show that the physicalist interpretation is of the evidence is wrong. I invite you to show me where I have made any mistakes. (sound of crickets)(December 13, 2013 at 2:49 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Then feel free to respond to my arguments, overdetermination, etc.Arguments are not evidence. Do you even know what the word 'equivocation' means?
Feel free to show me of where I have used equivocation. You are the one equivocating by acting as if correlation and causation are the same thing. They are not.