(December 16, 2013 at 7:15 am)Nineteen Wrote: This is a memorized sentence by all the homo people and atheists , they say "its not a disease because it has been removed from disease class in year 19....." , you can see this formulaic phrases from every single homo , a kind of defense mechanism , not a thought sentence but a reflex .
No, it isn't a disease because it does not fit the description of a disease:
a disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant, especially one that produces specific symptoms or that affects a specific location and is not simply a direct result of physical injury {Oxford English Dictionary}. Homosexuality does not fit this, so is not a disease.
Quote:Psychiatric units has been abolished the defining "disease" and renamed it as "gender identity disorder" . They dont say "This is a normal thing" .
I don't think you have a good grasp of, well, the English language here (this 'sentence' for want of a better word doesn't really make any sense). Also, gender identity disorder is characterized by a man (or woman) feeling like his (or her) personality and sense of self is that of the opposite sex. Basically, that he is stuck in a male body but should be female (or she is stuck in a female body but is a man). Nothing to do with homosexuality.
Quote:This is just a matter of preference , they prefer to remain "unnatural" . A perverse self orientation.
Not really, it is just what the want. What they find attractive. The kind of women that men find attractive has changed over time and is subject to societal pressure. There is nothing perverse about being gay, there is something perverse about caring that others are gay.
Quote:On the other hand , homo people are usually atheist because there are only atheist people who defend them and Atheist people defends homos without any scientific evidence because of it is rejected by religions .
The first bit (only atheists defend them) is partially true (fundamentalists have a long and dishonourable history of persecuting and killing gay people). Gay people are hardly likely to hang about with people who will at best verabally abuse them just because of who they are. The horrid, tolerant and accepting atheists must be the bad ones here.
Why would one need scientifically gathered evidence to be tolerant of others and uphold their human rights? What evidence could there be for this to be the wrong course of action?
Quote:Another hypocrisy of atheists . They say "our religions is science" but they defends their rigid thoughts without science .
Er, atheist don't have a religion. A-theist. Without theism. No belief in god. No religion. Atheists DO NOT HAVE RELIGION. By definition.
Quote:Warning : You will be ignored if you continue to personal attacks away from the heart of the matter .
Thanks for the warning, I guess?