(February 17, 2010 at 2:11 pm)tackattack Wrote: 1- I don't make the claim that God exists in the commonly accepted def. of reality or objectively at all. Quite the opposite actually.
2- I'll wait
3- Well it looks like he's done so define it for us, oh wise one, since you're using please.
4- No it's not reflexive rationalization. It's been a formulated conscious process of logical deduction. it's not rationalization, check your definitions. I'm fully prepared to reevaluate my beliefs and accept any accountability for that. It's just like an atheist to assume us frail little Christians are just afraid to let something goj/k anyways. Now, are you speaking of the validity of my deductive reasoing or the soundness of my premisis.. and yes I learned "debate speak" in roughly a week so cut me a little slack.
Why does the premises of deductive logiic have to follow objective perception? Could a premise be true and subjective?
1. In your imagination. Good that you can admit it.
2. When i get home, I promise

3. LOL wut?
4. What subjective or objective evidence did you use to come to such a logical conclusion? I'm talking specific examples in your life.