RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
December 19, 2013 at 6:39 am
(December 19, 2013 at 6:12 am)rasetsu Wrote:(December 19, 2013 at 1:55 am)snowtracks Wrote: book - The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time - hawking and ellis - "Einstein's General Theory of Relativity leads to two remarkable predictions: first, that the ultimate destiny of many massive stars is to undergo gravitational collapse and to disappear from view, leaving behind a 'black hole' in space; and secondly, that there will exist singularities in space-time itself. These singularities are places where space-time begins or ends, and the presently known laws of physics break down. They will occur inside black holes, and in the past are what might be construed as the beginning of the universe. To show how these predictions arise, the authors discuss the General Theory of Relativity in the large. Starting with a precise formulation of the theory and an account of the necessary background of differential geometry, the significance of space-time curvature is discussed and the global properties of a number of exact solutions of Einstein's field equations are examined". from - http://books.google.com/books/about/The_...gG_KI7Ll8C
This isn't even Hawking or Ellis writing, but looks to be nothing more than a publisher's blurb about the book. This isn't even remotely acceptable evidence of Hawking and Ellis' views on what preceded the big bang. God, you're a douche bag. Googling for hits with keywords and mining quotes is not science, it's the ethically challenged bollocks of the religious apologist with no brain and even less scholarship.
This is more than someone with such "ethically challenged bullocks" deserves. At this point, anyone with any self respect would either apologize for their piss poor apologetics or simply slink away in shame. Snowtracks do you finally have no shame or does your end truly justify any means?