You say you have an explanation. From the little bit of your book that I read, it's clear that you still have no explanation for this explanation...and it appears as though you've interpreted by pointing this flaw of yours out as a reason for not believing you an "argument from ignorance". Well isn't that special. I will accept that most gracious Socratic compliment. I don't believe you because you have not given me any knowledge about Gods, and due to your failure to establish anything believable, I remain ignorant in that regard. You clearly have no knowledge of Gods either, which makes 2 of us. Sadly, only one of us is aware of it. I will take my ignorance and a thirst for truth, and you can keep your artificial knowledge, it's not very quenching.
...and now, some cool stuff...HIT IT NEIL!
...and now, some cool stuff...HIT IT NEIL!
