RE: From atheism to Christianity? How so?
December 30, 2013 at 2:40 am
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2013 at 2:44 am by Minimalist.)
Quote:So, your interpretation that Jesus was in the mind of God doesn't fit the testimony of scripture, or even in its own context.
Surely you have figured out by now that no one puts any stock in your "scriptures." I reject that term and call them bullshit stories designed to impress the gullible.
Now I will concede that my view is quite jaded so I'll go with the opinion of biblical scholar Bart Ehrman who has demonstrated that this stuff is anonymous, fraudulent, mistake-ridden and heavily edited to suit the needs of the power structure as it emerged. I suggest you read Jesus Interrupted to learn how badly you have been conned.
Quote:A very large percentage of seminarians are completely blind-sided by the historical-critical method. They come in with the expectation of learning the pious truths of the Bible so that they can pass them along in their sermons, as their own pastors have done for them. Nothing prepares them for historical criticism. To their surprise they learn, instead of material for sermons, all the results of what historical critics have established on the basis of centuries of research. The Bible is filled with discrepancies, many of them irreconcilable contradictions. Moses did not write the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament) and Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John did not write the Gospels. There are other books that did
not make it into the Bible that at one time or another were considered canonical—other Gospels, for example, allegedly written by Jesus’ followers Peter, Thomas, and Mary. The Exodus probably did not happen as described in the Old Testament. The conquest of the Promised Land is probably based on legend. The Gospels are at odds on numerous points and contain nonhistorical material. It is hard to know whether Moses ever existed and what, exactly, the historical Jesus taught. The historical narratives of the Old Testament are filled with legendary fabrications and the book of Acts in the New Testament contains historically unreliable information about the life and teachings of Paul. Many of the books of the New Testament are pseudonymous—written not by the apostles but by later writers claiming to be apostles. The list goes on.
Bart Ehrman - Jesus Interrupted Pg. 5-6
It gets better from there but I doubt you have the courage to read it.