RE: Privacy concerns from [split] AF Hall of Shame (Post Edition)
December 31, 2013 at 2:40 pm
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2013 at 2:41 pm by houseofcantor.)
(December 31, 2013 at 1:56 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: There is no 'atheist position' regarding anything other than deities.
I would disagree, but that's why I put it in quotes. For instance, when someone makes an online presence and includes "atheism" or "atheist" in the title, I would assume rational skepticism and use of the scientific method. Again, perhaps this is just me...
(December 31, 2013 at 1:58 pm)Jacob(smooth) Wrote:(December 31, 2013 at 12:59 pm)whateverist Wrote: I saw that too. I think there was a miscommunication about what was happening there. Jacob got more than he bargained for but in a sense only because he issued the 'dare'.
Still I think the critique about the privacy policy as stated and as practiced is still valid.
Just for clarity, Rayaan has done his investigating before I asked him to impress me with HOW he knew who I was. I'd forgotten that he was a mod and thus had my email address (making it a lot less impressive). The only difference me asking made was that I got to know what he'd already discovered. It was not the reason for the investigation. That has been defined variously as, "because I was bored" and "because I was suspicious".
I don't see the issue, and I think you should stick around, 'cause you alright.