RE: Dear God, Eve what have you done?
January 4, 2014 at 2:32 pm
(This post was last modified: January 4, 2014 at 3:05 pm by Drich.)
(January 4, 2014 at 2:06 pm)Brakeman Wrote:seriously i have no idea what your talking about. please point them out(January 4, 2014 at 1:31 am)Drich Wrote: How do you know she was not made that way?
Sez so in your "Big-Book-O-Crazy".
And don't act like you're not familiar with the verses and need them pointed out to you.
(January 4, 2014 at 2:25 pm)Bunny Wrote: Did I say I don't get something?the content and phrasing of your questions demonstrate that you do not understand what is being discussed. You believe creation and evolution can not co-exist. My arguement says that it can/did.
Quote:Specifically I was wanting to know if you somehow rectified reality with the Bible or denied the evidence altogether.rectified. In that God created the garden on day three and placed Adam/Man made in the image of God in the garden to care for it. everything that happens in the garden was cordened off and completely seperate from the 'evolutionary process' that happened outside the garden.
Quote:Being it the former, I'd like to kno specific details about what you believe Neanderthals were, for instance, and where they lie on your 'timeline'.Go back and carfully read the Creation/evolution OP. it explains all of this.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-14190.html
Quote:Also how on earth you think two people populated a world,Again read the OP in the link above.
Quote:which was then completely flooded (without evidence for such a. event)The evidence is all around we just don't understand what we are looking at. For we never had an example of a flood on that scale happen in that way. Every instance of flood we have is produced from an existing or a collective body of water breaking it's confines and flooding a nother area taking debris with it. Noah's flood did not happen that way. The way it happened was the earth puke up water as well as rain came down. No sudden in rush means no trail of debris from other places.
Example: take a 5 gallon bucket fill 1/2 with water and and 1/2 with clay. mix it then dump it out. the mud spreads every where. This is an example of liquid moving from place to another carring debris it picked up along the way. the 'evidence' we know to look for in a flood is completely dependant on the movement of water from a source to another area. (Like the tsunamis)
Now take the same bucket fill it 1/2 with ice and the the same type of clay on top. as the ice melts the clay will fill from the bottom up and saturate the clay. the clay does not move because the saturation happens in an even controlled way. This is what Genesis describes. Now given enouh time the water will evaporate leaving hard pack clay which if given enough time will turn into stone.
The evidence is there, we (some of us) just do not know what they are looking at.
Quote:save for a family, then repopulated to our current state in a 5-6k yr time period? I mean have you seen the Archaeological history of human beings?The Pre-flood archaeological history of humanity would still exist. why is it so hard to understand that post flood man would not utilize these structures? Oh, that's right because you assume that the flood would have leveled these cities.
Quote:Oh wreally?follow the above link
Care to demonstrate?