RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
January 6, 2014 at 1:49 pm
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2014 at 1:50 pm by downbeatplumb.)
(January 6, 2014 at 9:14 am)Chas Wrote: The concept of 'one-way' speed of light fails utterly since regardless of what direction is chosen for a two-way measurement, the result is always the same.
"I'm light, I'm gonna go quite fast in this direction but on the way back it will take no time at all, just coz."
This one way speed of light idea is just a desperate trick to try and shoehorn in a young universe against all the evidence.
It is nothing but creationists looking at the evidence and saying "ah but what if (insert bullshit here)" which is what they do to everything.
No evidence is ever presented, just an attempt to shit on the facts to justify their mad position which they will always maintain no mater what the facts are.
They are a lost cause and not really worth bothering with.
(January 6, 2014 at 9:14 am)Chas Wrote: The concept of 'one-way' speed of light fails utterly since regardless of what direction is chosen for a two-way measurement, the result is always the same.
"I'm light, I'm gonna go quite fast in this direction but on the way back it will take no time at all, just coz."
This one way speed of light idea is just a desperate trick to try and shoehorn in a young universe against all the evidence.
It is nothing but creationists looking at the evidence and saying "ah but what if (insert bullshit here)" which is what they do to everything.
No evidence is ever presented, just an attempt to shit on the facts to justify their mad position which they will always maintain no mater what the facts are.
They are a lost cause and not really worth bothering with.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
