(January 8, 2014 at 11:07 am)Drich Wrote:(January 8, 2014 at 3:21 am)Bunny Wrote: Methinks you have no idea the moral fortitude of Esquilax, and to assume he'd dismiss actual evidence for god is folly. It's easy to identify the reasoning behind this; you simply wish it to be true, because that would then make alllllll the atheists allllll over the world-- merely in denial, rather than waiting for actual evidence/reasoning/proof for believing in something, a step you yourself seem to have skipped.
this could be true if I hadn't spent a year maybe even a year and a half talking with esq. There has been more than one topic Esq has walked away from without a formal concession or any other type of resolution.
I will grant Esq will go beyond the typical atheist retoric, but in the end when faced with something he does not like he simply moves to dismiss via personal attack rather than addressing the topic itself, just like everyone else.
Oh, please! You were asked for evidence (any evidence!) for your claim, and you have not only failed to provide it but you have indulged in the most childish obfuscation to avoid providing it. Somehow, in the fantasy land that is your faith, that adds up to a rhetorical victory. The only person convinced/fooled by this silly ruse is you.
Humor Esquilax (and the rest of us) and grant the possibility that if your evidence is sufficient to convince you, then it ought to be convincing to other rational people. Please provide it or acknowledge that you don't give a tinker's damn about evidence. It's one or the other.