Dear God, Eve what have you done?

[Esquilax]

I am going to side step the above as a 'pissing contest.' (as you don't real ask or answer any questions in the above post.)

Yes, pretending I didn't bring up the things I did is a much easier thing to do than refuting them. Your failure to do so has been noted.

First we must identify what a soul is or isn't. The soul is not a tangable physical object, so to look for physical evidence now or 6000 years ago is a fools errand. Not to mention even if you had a working model of physical soul detection, what specimine would you test it on? do you have adam and eve's remains?

Right, so if you can't detect it, how did you confirm that it's there at all?

That said SCIENCE has identified the soul as a consciencous or a manifestation of our selfawareness, and this cant be tested.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bioc...e-says-yes

Yeah, what you actually linked to was an article filled with vague ramblings, the only thing close to a scientific reference being an offhand remark about the double slit experiment, which basically just asserts "quantum mechanics is weird, therefore a soul, maybe." It doesn't state what you say it does, so let's dial back on what "science has identified," hmm? This is either dishonesty, or wishful thinking on your part.

even so, one must provide a living test subject, human remains are not viable for testing.

Right, so how did you determine there was a point that the soul was bred into mankind.

Because before the introduction of the Soul into the population of Man, 'Man' was nothing more than a platoon of up right monkeys. The bible does not describe the behaviorial patterns of any animals except in passing.

Okay, so first of all, demonstrably wrong: mankind had religions, agriculture, and full human-ness six thousand years ago. And again, "it doesn't say it didn't happen," is not evidence that it did happen.

Which it does here as well. It says Cain moved into a city after the murder of Abel, and it also says he was married. To whom if not one of the monkey people?

Yeah, the bible I just read says Cain went to live in "the land of Nod." There's no reference to a city, and "land," can just be.... you know, land.

And pointing out a problem with the bible's logic does not mean your workaround is true: it just means there's a problem with the bible's logic. What you just committed is an argument from ignorance, but funnily enough, I've argued with christians who are happy to admit that the human species was begat through incest to begin with, because Adam and Eve had "perfect genes," so... let's not pretend you've found the only truth, here.

"You" shouldn't unless your looking for a reason to seek out God, but feel you can not because of an unresolved issue you have with creationism verse evolution.

Is that the reason you believe it?

If this is not the case then go about your business, this should not impact your life any more than the issue of thor when the Hulk was able to pick up his Hammer.

Oh, I enjoy theoretical discussions. I just wish I could get you to engage in it too.

..and if I can using science then what?

You haven't so far. If you do, that'll lead to follow on investigations on my part, certainly.