RE: Which Quantum Mechanical Interpretation to you Like/Prefer?
January 11, 2014 at 12:23 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2014 at 12:24 pm by Chas.)
The mathematics describe observation and predict behavior - it is a model, not reality.
There seem to be a dozen or two interpretations. I haven't studied more than a couple, but I will.
However, I reject any interpretation that implies the observer affects reality.
I think a team like Dennett and Hofstadter is what we need for explaining QM.
There seem to be a dozen or two interpretations. I haven't studied more than a couple, but I will.
However, I reject any interpretation that implies the observer affects reality.
I think a team like Dennett and Hofstadter is what we need for explaining QM.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
