RE: reasons to believe, there is no God
February 28, 2010 at 5:03 pm
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2010 at 5:10 pm by Watson.)
EDIT: WC, the only fleas who can't comprehend the dog they are on are the so-called 'disbelievers in Dog', who deny the dog and only believe in the hair trees growing around them because they can see them. 
Nice analogy, dood.
I'm not, you're merely taking the Bible as equating to God. Guess what? The Bible is a fucking book, Min. It is not equal to God in the slightest, it is a book written by men about God as they understood him. The men of that time period had no clue how science or physics works, so they attributed the things which seemed to them completely random as God's work, and ths you get the supposedly 'bloodthirsty' God presented in the OT. Read up, Min.
Nice analogy, dood. (February 28, 2010 at 4:59 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Even you can't be that dense.
I'm not, you're merely taking the Bible as equating to God. Guess what? The Bible is a fucking book, Min. It is not equal to God in the slightest, it is a book written by men about God as they understood him. The men of that time period had no clue how science or physics works, so they attributed the things which seemed to them completely random as God's work, and ths you get the supposedly 'bloodthirsty' God presented in the OT. Read up, Min.
