(February 28, 2010 at 5:25 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: For the last time, I'm responding to your claim about logic. Yes you provided me with a link and the findings of the thread's arguments from every premise resulted in a paradox, congratulations.
If you read the link you'd see how it proved the fallacy you're making.
(February 28, 2010 at 5:25 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: No what you said was we require supernatural methods of detection for finding god, therefore we cannot know. You've identified your "theory for god", then demonstrated that it makes no predictions, or that the predictions it does make cannot ever be wrong, even if the theory is false. That is an outlandish assertion, and if you don't mind me saying, a rather arrogant claim that tells us an awful lot about your position.
I am bored and tired so I'll ask you one last time, how do you know logic cannot refute logically impossible concepts insupportable by evidence, (not logically unknowable or improbable) such as god?
What I gave was an explanation to your previous question of why you can't prove or disprove god. See that link again to see the preposterous nature of your question.
All the time you're asking me to give YOU evidence of why this unsupportable claim of yours cannot be. How about just once you produce the goods?
