(March 3, 2010 at 10:53 am)Tiberius Wrote: It's not a matter of not being able to see a way in which it can be possible, it's a matter of God being non-empirical and thereby by definition not testable by science...
It is non-empirical currently, but just as DNA is now observable, how can we say we will never find an avenue in which to find empirical evidence to suggest the existence or non-existence of a God?
Saying that it is an unanswerable question and basing it on means that we haven't thought of yet isn't a valid argument. Yes, I completely understand that by today's standards, the question has no answer scientifically, but it would be foolish to say we will never get a definitive answer. I simply withhold judgment. Those making the claim that we will never find a scientific answer need to provide evidence for the claim, and how they contend that the evidence is true.
