RE: Argument from Absoluteness
January 20, 2014 at 3:17 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2014 at 3:20 am by bennyboy.)
I think you're subtly equivocating on slightly different meanings of "absolute." If you include relational properties as a possession of an entity, then nothing in a dynamic universe can be absolute. But I'd argue if the NATURE of the relational properties is always the same, you can still call it absolute. For example, if God is a philosophical quantity, anything could flow from it, so long as the nature of things is that things equally flow back to it.
As for personal relationships-- that's just Santa Claus with a different name. The idea that God is watching teenagers rub on out in the shower and saying "Tsk! Tsk!" is really no definition of God at all, in my opinion, since God, being eternal, should not be capable of changing emotions.
As for personal relationships-- that's just Santa Claus with a different name. The idea that God is watching teenagers rub on out in the shower and saying "Tsk! Tsk!" is really no definition of God at all, in my opinion, since God, being eternal, should not be capable of changing emotions.
